Difference between revisions of "When to use a new record"

From CCS Cataloging Manual
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 5: Line 5:
*[http://www.ala.org/alcts/sites/ala.org.alcts/files/content/resources/org/cat/differences07.pdf Differences Between, Changes Within (ALA)]
*[http://www.ala.org/alcts/sites/ala.org.alcts/files/content/resources/org/cat/differences07.pdf Differences Between, Changes Within (ALA)]
}}
}}
This page covers all MARC formats.
Follow OCLC guidelines for when to use a new record, with these exceptions in the CCS database.


In the CCS database, follow [http://access.rdatoolkit.org/rdachp1_rda1-737.html RDA 1.6] and OCLC guidelines for when to use a new record, with these exceptions/interpretations. For any difference that by itself does not justify a new record, compare other fields for additional differences that ''may'' justify a new record. If a situation is not covered here as a local exception, follow OCLC guidelines.
==Books==
For any of the following differences, use an existing record:
 
;020/024/028
:Different standard numbers


;250
;250
:A difference in edition statement, that indicates a difference in binding (e.g. First paperback edition, Library edition) or does not otherwise indicate a difference in content, does '''not''' justify a new record.
:Edition statement related to binding (e.g. First paperback edition)


;300{{subfield|a}} (print)
;264{{subfield|b}}
:A difference in pagination of less than 10%, if there is no indication of a significant difference in content, does '''not''' justify a new record.
:Difference in publisher if in the same publishing house/group
 
;264{{subfield|c}}
:Difference in publication date of 1 year or less
 
;300{{subfield|a}}
:Difference in pagination of 10 pages or less
 
;300{{subfield|c}}
:Difference in size of 2 cm or less
 
==Audio==
For any of the following differences, use an existing record:
 
;020/024/028
:Different standard numbers
 
;250
:Edition statement related to packaging (e.g. Library edition)


;300{{subfield|a}} (audio)
;264{{subfield|b}}
:A difference in playing time of 30 min. or less, if there is no indication of a significant difference in content,  does '''not''' justify a new record.
:Difference in publisher if in the same publishing house/group


;300{{subfield|a}} (video)
;264{{subfield|c}}
:A difference in running time of 3 min. or less, if there is no indication of a significant difference in content, does '''not''' justify a new record.
:Difference in publication date of 1 year or less


;300{{subfield|b}}
;300{{subfield|a}}
:A difference in illustrations (e.g. absence vs. presence or color vs. black & white) justifies a new record. ''Note'': If this is the only difference, supply a bracketed edition statement in the master record to justify the new record per OCLC guidelines.
:Difference in playing time of 30 min. or less


;300{{subfield|c}}
==Video==
:A difference of more than 2 cm justifies a new record.
For any of the following differences, use an existing record:


;340{{subfield|n}}
;020/024/028
:A significant difference in font size justifies a new record.
:Different standard numbers


;490
;264{{subfield|b}}
:A difference, addition, or removal of a series statement does '''not''' justify a new record.
:Difference in publisher if in the same publishing house/group


;500
;264{{subfield|c}}
:A difference in aspect ratio justifies a new record.
:Difference in publication date of 1 year or less


;511
;300{{subfield|a}}
:A difference in performers (e.g. audiobook narrator) justifies a new record.
:Difference in running time of 3 min. or less


==eResources==
A separate bibliographic record is needed for eContent that is provided by different vendors. For example, if the same eBook is available through Overdrive, Axis360, and cloudLibrary, there should be three separate bibliographic records, one for each vendor.


Additionally, any difference in significant content justifies a new record. Examples of "significant content" include, but are not limited to:
==Examples==
Examples of differences that require a new record in both OCLC and the CCS database:  


* substantive foreword, afterword, introduction, epilogue, postscript
* new chapter, illustrations, introduction, foreword, afterword, postscript  
* new chapter, new research, new illustrations, substantial corrections
* reader’s guide, discussion questions, interview with the author
* reader’s guide, discussion questions, interview with the author
* explicit vs. edited lyrics
* with vs. without special features
* with vs. without special features
* video language options (soundtrack, subtitles, intertitles)
* video language options (soundtrack, subtitles, intertitles)
* accompanying book vs. accompanying CD-ROM
* accompanying book vs. accompanying CD-ROM


 
Examples of “insignificant” content that does not, by itself, justify a new record in either OCLC or the CCS database:
Examples of “insignificant” content that does not, by itself, justify a new record:
* brief, promotional foreword with no substantive content
* brief, promotional foreword with no substantive content
* promotional excerpt from another work
* promotional excerpt from another work
* accompanying material that is promotional or advertising in nature, or intended as a free give-away, or otherwise not integral to usage of the item
* accompanying material that is promotional or advertising in nature, or intended as a free give-away, or otherwise not integral to usage of the item


When in doubt, use a new record.
When in doubt, use a new record.


 
==When using an existing record==
==If a new record is not justified==
If according to the guidelines a new record is not justified for the item in hand, make the following additions in the existing record. Do '''not''' change the fixed field, 264, etc. solely to match the item in hand. However, any outright errors in the original record may be corrected.
If according to the guidelines a new record is not justified for the item in hand, use an existing record. Make the following additions in the bibliographic record. Do '''not''' change the fixed field, 264, etc. solely to match the item in hand. However, any outright errors in the original record may be corrected.
* Add applicable standard numbers (020, 024, 028) for the item in hand, with qualifiers.
* Add applicable standard numbers (020, 024, 028) for the item in hand, with qualifiers.
* Add an explanatory 500 note if the difference between the record and the item in hand cannot be described sufficiently in an 02X qualifier. (Optionally, add such a note even if the difference is described sufficiently in the 02X.)
* Add an explanatory 500 note if the difference between the record and the item in hand cannot be described sufficiently in an 02X qualifier. (Optionally, add such a note even if the difference is described sufficiently in the 02X.)
* If applicable, add 490/8XX for any different series statements that appear on the item in hand, with an explanatory 500 note.
==eContent==
A separate bibliographic record is needed for eContent that is provided by different vendors. For example, if the same eBook is available through Overdrive, Axis360, and cloudLibrary, there should be three separate bibliographic records, one for each vendor.


==Local library exception==
==Local library exception==
When a library receives a copy that requires a new record according to these guidelines, that library may choose to attach it to an existing record instead. If this is done, the existing record must '''not''' be modified to reflect this nonstandard usage. (The library should be aware that this may cause state or national problems with interlibrary loan: a library may request your copy via OCLC, but what is owned is not exactly what the patron wanted.)
When a library receives a copy that requires a new record according to these guidelines, that library may choose to attach it to an existing record instead. If this is done, the existing record must '''not''' be modified to reflect this nonstandard usage. (The library should be aware that this may cause state or national problems with interlibrary loan: a library may request your copy via OCLC, but what is owned is not exactly what the patron wanted.)

Revision as of 17:40, 16 November 2018

Follow OCLC guidelines for when to use a new record, with these exceptions in the CCS database.

Books

For any of the following differences, use an existing record:

020/024/028
Different standard numbers
250
Edition statement related to binding (e.g. First paperback edition)
264‡b
Difference in publisher if in the same publishing house/group
264‡c
Difference in publication date of 1 year or less
300‡a
Difference in pagination of 10 pages or less
300‡c
Difference in size of 2 cm or less

Audio

For any of the following differences, use an existing record:

020/024/028
Different standard numbers
250
Edition statement related to packaging (e.g. Library edition)
264‡b
Difference in publisher if in the same publishing house/group
264‡c
Difference in publication date of 1 year or less
300‡a
Difference in playing time of 30 min. or less

Video

For any of the following differences, use an existing record:

020/024/028
Different standard numbers
264‡b
Difference in publisher if in the same publishing house/group
264‡c
Difference in publication date of 1 year or less
300‡a
Difference in running time of 3 min. or less

eResources

A separate bibliographic record is needed for eContent that is provided by different vendors. For example, if the same eBook is available through Overdrive, Axis360, and cloudLibrary, there should be three separate bibliographic records, one for each vendor.

Examples

Examples of differences that require a new record in both OCLC and the CCS database:

  • new chapter, illustrations, introduction, foreword, afterword, postscript
  • reader’s guide, discussion questions, interview with the author
  • with vs. without special features
  • video language options (soundtrack, subtitles, intertitles)
  • accompanying book vs. accompanying CD-ROM

Examples of “insignificant” content that does not, by itself, justify a new record in either OCLC or the CCS database:

  • brief, promotional foreword with no substantive content
  • promotional excerpt from another work
  • accompanying material that is promotional or advertising in nature, or intended as a free give-away, or otherwise not integral to usage of the item

When in doubt, use a new record.

When using an existing record

If according to the guidelines a new record is not justified for the item in hand, make the following additions in the existing record. Do not change the fixed field, 264, etc. solely to match the item in hand. However, any outright errors in the original record may be corrected.

  • Add applicable standard numbers (020, 024, 028) for the item in hand, with qualifiers.
  • Add an explanatory 500 note if the difference between the record and the item in hand cannot be described sufficiently in an 02X qualifier. (Optionally, add such a note even if the difference is described sufficiently in the 02X.)

Local library exception

When a library receives a copy that requires a new record according to these guidelines, that library may choose to attach it to an existing record instead. If this is done, the existing record must not be modified to reflect this nonstandard usage. (The library should be aware that this may cause state or national problems with interlibrary loan: a library may request your copy via OCLC, but what is owned is not exactly what the patron wanted.)